Evaluating cup-tied rules and AFCON impact
I'm exploring the cup-tied rule, which was relaxed in 2018 to allow players to represent two clubs in the UCL within the same season after February. However, I need to consider changes in the league phase and registration specifics. Exclusions from the UCL list could suggest a player isn't part of the plans, which might impact salary or bonuses. I'm also looking into AFCON scheduling, which has been moved to December 2025–January 2026, overlapping with the UCL league phase.Analyzing AFCON impact on player roster
I’m considering the implications if Salah misses multiple UCL matches due to AFCON. That could mean he wouldn't be included in the squad. To verify his status, I should check the official UEFA squad list, the club's website, and press conference updates. I might also need to analyze Premier League registrations and injury updates. Since this isn't coding, I'll keep it concise, with a quick answer, explanations, and implications on what to watch for next.Clarifying homegrown status
I need to note that for List A, there are up to 25 players, with 17 classified as non-homegrown. Salah is one of the non-homegrown players. For Liverpool, I should check the non-homegrown count, which includes Alisson and Van Dijk, while assessing Konate's status—he's trained in France, so he's non-homegrown. Jota's situation seems a bit tricky; he spent time at Wolves from age 20 to 23, but the homegrown requirement isn't met, as he doesn't have the qualifying three years. I'm trying to stay clear of too many specifics to avoid inaccuracies.Clarifying UEFA list changes and tracking updates
I want to add that the UEFA list changes in February allow for the replacement of up to three players. It’s also important to note that being left out in September doesn’t necessarily mean a permanent goodbye. Should I offer to track credible updates? I can browse if permitted, but I might need to check for approval before using the network. Keeping it simple, I should ask for a link to confirm if I can proceed!
我暂时无法核实最新名单和俱乐部动向，但就“被拿出欧冠名单”这件事，本质上有几种常见原因，各自传递的信号不一样。给你一个判断框架，方便你结合消息源做结论：
可能性与含义
- 伤停期较长：若官方伤病报告显示要到年末/来年才复出，俱乐部会先不报欧冠（25人名额+非本土名额有限）。这更像务实取舍，不是“冷处理”，也不等于要走。
- 非本土名额挤压：欧冠A名单最多25人，其中“非本土球员”名额有限。如果夏窗引援多、名额吃紧，资方会在短期不可用或状态未明的非本土球员上做取舍。这偏向阵容与规则博弈，不代表一定告别，但地位相对不稳。
- 战术/竞技层面降权：健康却仍未被注册，且多场关键战无上场迹象、训练分组边缘化、主帅发布会措辞疏离。这才像“冷处理”的典型信号。
- 合同与转会博弈：若合同将到期（或续约停滞）且有明确外部报价/经纪人活动频繁，被排除可能是降风险、给谈判施压或为冬窗/明夏转出做铺垫。这更接近“告别前奏”。
- 赛历因素（如国家队长征）：如果赛季上半程会长期离队（例如洲际杯赛时段与欧冠赛程高度重叠），也可能被暂时放弃。理性操作，不等于告别。
如何快速验证倾向
- 官方渠道优先：俱乐部官宣的欧冠A/B名单页面、主帅新闻发布会逐字稿。是否说明“伤病/康复期”“名额与规则”还是回避问题。
- 训练与出场：是否正常参加合练、是否进入英超比赛日大名单。健康却持续不出场，是强烈负面信号。
- 经纪人与转会面向：是否出现可靠记者的续约谈判停滞/外部接触报道（留意措辞等级：接触/报价/谈判进展）。
- 时间窗口：欧冠在冬歇期前后可调整名单（通常可更换/新增3人）。若只是小伤或名额权衡，常见做法是到淘汰赛前再注册；若届时仍不注册，风险升级。
针对萨拉赫的特别点
- 资历与商业价值极高，若健康且留队，长期被弃用的概率本就很低；被排除通常要么是伤停、要么是明确的合同/转会方向。
- 欧冠注册并不“杯赛绑定”到无法转会（规则多次放宽），所以“为避免杯绑而不注册”的理由成立度较低，更多还是名额/健康/关系层面的决策。
结论建议
- 若有明确伤停时间或名额解释，更像阶段性取舍，不是告别。
- 若健康、无伤，却被排除且持续不出场、续约无进展，那更接近“告别前奏”而非单纯冷处理。
- 关键观察点是冬窗前后的二次注册和主帅表态变化。
如果你有具体的新闻链接或记者报道（例如俱乐部官宣、主帅发布会、可靠记者推文），贴给我，我可以据此给出更精确的判断。
